★★★★★ moma doc fortnight 2025: this is amazing. 1. lucy raven mentioned in class there is value in rethinking abandoned questions. 2. history is embodied, if not replaced, by pop culture. an ecological feedback of succession. 3. languages is only really effective in assigning certain things to work, not when describing them.
chronia 2025-02-08
人类真是太虚伪又残忍 还很擅长自我感动沾沾自喜 甚至很乐于展示这一切
vöyuer 2025-02-26
★★★★★ moma doc fortnight 2025: this is amazing. 1. lucy raven mentioned in class there is value in rethinking abandoned questions. 2. history is embodied, if not replaced, by pop culture. an ecological feedback of succession. 3. languages is only really effective in assigning certain things to work, not when describing them.
葱酱 2025-02-01
作为courtney stephens的电影挺让人失望的,像是看了90分钟****。这人打着科学和灵修的名义折磨海豚和鲸鱼还能被说是掀起了那一代动物保护运动?况且这种偏爱“通人性”动物的物种保护现在已经广为诟病,仅仅陈述历史事实不是保持客观而是无知和懦弱。
胤祥 2025-02-04
#10957。54th IFFR-Harbor。**科学家的传记纪录片,形式挺中规中矩,档案材料加全片旁白,比较少的几个采访(居然还包括佐杜洛夫斯基)。研究非常扎实,解说写得也很好,其中做得最好的部分就是分析John Lilly的“研究”如何逐渐对大众文化产生,包括社会运动(保护海洋哺乳动物)、两部好莱坞科幻惊悚片及一款视*游戏等,JL本**成为了反文化运动偶像(大概还是因为***,居然能跟金斯堡齐名了!)跟导演2024的《发明》里关注的人物还颇有点相通之处。